User Tools

Site Tools


phonology_and_orthography

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
phonology_and_orthography [2018/08/26 15:16]
ob [Fricatives] about SC
phonology_and_orthography [2018/08/26 18:37]
ob [Fricatives] sc
Line 39: Line 39:
     * unused letter, e.g. **c** like in Lojban or **x** like in Catalan and Portuguese?     * unused letter, e.g. **c** like in Lojban or **x** like in Catalan and Portuguese?
     * diacritic symbol on another letter, e.g. **ŝ** like in Esperanto?     * diacritic symbol on another letter, e.g. **ŝ** like in Esperanto?
-    * **sc**, with isolated **c** //either// not defined //or// representing unused [x]?+    * **sc**, where additionally an isolated **c** is //either// not defined //or// represents the unused [x]?
     * **sj**? (would have the mildly adverse effect of blurring the distinction between [ʃ] and [sj]).     * **sj**? (would have the mildly adverse effect of blurring the distinction between [ʃ] and [sj]).
   * [x ~ χ] ([ç] as well???)?   * [x ~ χ] ([ç] as well???)?
Line 236: Line 236:
   * [w] is not included   * [w] is not included
   * [x]/[χ] is not included   * [x]/[χ] is not included
-  * **C/c** for [ʃ] — whether this one is used in normal words will be decided later+  * **C/c** for [ʃ] — whether this one is used in normal words will be decided later. [[User_Ob]] says: I believe it was me who proposed this, but maybe it's too weird/unusual. See my **"sc"** idea.
   * it is allowed to pronounce the letters a little different, for example **v** as [ʋ] or **s** as [z], where the sounds from above are the default   * it is allowed to pronounce the letters a little different, for example **v** as [ʋ] or **s** as [z], where the sounds from above are the default
  
 If you've got strong arguments against any of these decisions, feel free to add them here or visit the IRC-channel! If you've got strong arguments against any of these decisions, feel free to add them here or visit the IRC-channel!
  
phonology_and_orthography.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/03 21:09 by fenris