User Tools

Site Tools


phonology_and_orthography

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
phonology_and_orthography [2020/05/31 12:40]
fenris
phonology_and_orthography [2020/05/31 13:08]
fenris [Plosives]
Line 1: Line 1:
 # Content # Content
  
-## Lateral approximants+## Classes 
 + 
 +### Lateral approximants 
 - **L/l** (runic **ᛚ**) for \[l\] - **L/l** (runic **ᛚ**) for \[l\]
  
-## Nasals+### Nasals
  
 - **M/m** (runic **ᛗ**) for \[m\] - **M/m** (runic **ᛗ**) for \[m\]
Line 15: Line 18:
  
  
-## Plosives+### Plosives
  
 - **P/p** (runic **ᛈ**) for \[p\] - **P/p** (runic **ᛈ**) for \[p\]
Line 22: Line 25:
 - **D/d** (runic **ᛞ**) for \[d\] - **D/d** (runic **ᛞ**) for \[d\]
 - **K/k** (runic **ᚲ**) for \[k\] - **K/k** (runic **ᚲ**) for \[k\]
-- **G/g** (runic **ᚷ**) for \[g\] (not totally clear, e.g. [[References#sko03|sko03]] proposes to speak this letter as \[j\] in words ending with **-ig**+- **G/g** (runic **ᚷ**) for \[g\] (not totally clear, e.g. [[references:sko03|Reference: sko03]] proposes to speak this letter as \[j\] in words ending with **-ig**
 - \[θ\] and \[ð\]? - \[θ\] and \[ð\]?
     - most proposals don't include these two as most Germanic languages eliminated them except of English and Icelandic     - most proposals don't include these two as most Germanic languages eliminated them except of English and Icelandic
Line 29: Line 32:
     - [this poll](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1637305) resulted in replacing these sounds with \[d\] (written **d**) and/or \[t\] (written **t**)     - [this poll](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1637305) resulted in replacing these sounds with \[d\] (written **d**) and/or \[t\] (written **t**)
  
-## Fricatives+### Fricatives
  
 - **H/h** (runic **ᚺ**) for \[h\] - **H/h** (runic **ᚺ**) for \[h\]
Line 52: Line 55:
     - diacritic symbol on another letter, e.g. **ĥ** like in Esperanto?     - diacritic symbol on another letter, e.g. **ĥ** like in Esperanto?
  
-## Semivowels+### Semivowels
  
 - **J/j** (runic **ᛃ**) for \[j\] - **J/j** (runic **ᛃ**) for \[j\]
Line 58: Line 61:
     - [Poll in yahoo-group](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1627085) voted for replacing the letter from proto-Germanic with \[v\]     - [Poll in yahoo-group](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1627085) voted for replacing the letter from proto-Germanic with \[v\]
  
-## Vowels+### Vowels
  
 - **I/i** (runic **ᛁ** or **ᛇ**) for \[i\] or \[ɪ\] - **I/i** (runic **ᛁ** or **ᛇ**) for \[i\] or \[ɪ\]
phonology_and_orthography.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/03 21:09 by fenris