User Tools

Site Tools


phonology_and_orthography

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
phonology_and_orthography [2020/12/01 20:11]
fenris [Plosives]
phonology_and_orthography [2020/12/03 21:09] (current)
fenris
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<markdown>
 # Content # Content
  
Line 37: Line 38:
 - **V/v** for \[v\]? - **V/v** for \[v\]?
     - [Poll in yahoo-group](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1627085) voted for using this sound and symbol for the Proto-Germanic \[w\]     - [Poll in yahoo-group](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1627085) voted for using this sound and symbol for the Proto-Germanic \[w\]
 +- \[θ\] and \[ð\]?
 +    - most proposals don't include these two as most Germanic languages eliminated them except of English and Icelandic
 +    - by the bigramms **Th/th** and **Dh/dh** (almost like in English)?
 +    - by the symbols **Þ/þ** (runic **ᚦ**) and **Đ/ð** (like in Icelandic)?
 +    - [this poll](http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/folkspraak/surveys?id=1637305) resulted in replacing these sounds with \[d\] (written **d**) and/or \[t\] (written **t**)
 - \[ʃ\]? (and \[ɕ\]?) - \[ʃ\]? (and \[ɕ\]?)
     - most Germanic languages have that sound     - most Germanic languages have that sound
Line 362: Line 368:
  
 If you've got strong arguments against any of these decisions, feel free to add them here or visit the IRC-channel! If you've got strong arguments against any of these decisions, feel free to add them here or visit the IRC-channel!
 +</markdown>
  
phonology_and_orthography.1606849902.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/01 20:11 by fenris