This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
pos_marking [2014/10/16 14:06] ob affix overloading |
pos_marking [2019/08/22 18:49] (current) ob example of -er for verb ending (Scandi) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The big question is this: how should these words be morphologically related to one another? Here are some options. | The big question is this: how should these words be morphologically related to one another? Here are some options. | ||
- | * Use the same word for the noun and verb, like with " | + | * Use the same word for the noun and verb, like with " |
- | *Inflect all verbs for the present tense and imperative mood, e.g. with **-e** or **-a**. This would make the noun/verb distinction always clear, and derivation between the two would be simple. The disadvantage is all verbs having an extra syllable, which would often feel tedious and redundant. | + | *Inflect all verbs for the present tense and imperative mood, e.g. with **-e** or **-er** or **-a**. This would make the noun/verb distinction always clear, and derivation between the two would be simple. The disadvantage is all verbs having an extra syllable, which would often feel tedious and redundant, mainly to non-Scandinavians. |
* Have markers for derived basic nouns/ | * Have markers for derived basic nouns/ | ||
* Have separate roots, like with " | * Have separate roots, like with " |