This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
protocols [2017/10/29 23:41] rayza [2017-10-29] |
protocols [2017/10/31 22:49] (current) rayza [2017-10-29] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
* strong verbs seem to be use throughout the Germanic languages even if not very consistently | * strong verbs seem to be use throughout the Germanic languages even if not very consistently | ||
* having them for the past tenses makes the language somewhat more complex, thus using the regular form instead should probably be allowed | * having them for the past tenses makes the language somewhat more complex, thus using the regular form instead should probably be allowed | ||
- | * strong verbs seem to form the base of certain nominalizations and adjectivizations; | + | * strong verbs seem to form the base of certain nominalizations and adjectivizations; |
* discussion about the comparative and superlative (of adjectives) | * discussion about the comparative and superlative (of adjectives) | ||
* PG features -ōzô and -izô for the comparative but a distinction was lost in quite some languages and from present point of view making a distinction in the Nordic language is not really possible if you don't know it already | * PG features -ōzô and -izô for the comparative but a distinction was lost in quite some languages and from present point of view making a distinction in the Nordic language is not really possible if you don't know it already |