User Tools

Site Tools


protocols

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
protocols [2017/05/04 22:39]
fenris [2017-05-02]
protocols [2017/10/31 22:49]
rayza [2017-10-29]
Line 118: Line 118:
       * **Brügsprak** (~ //bridge language//)       * **Brügsprak** (~ //bridge language//)
       * **Mansprak** (~ //human language//)       * **Mansprak** (~ //human language//)
-==== 2017-04-05 ====+==== 2017-05-04 ====
   * discussion about /x/...yet again,possible solutions:   * discussion about /x/...yet again,possible solutions:
       * turn it into /k/ or /g/       * turn it into /k/ or /g/
Line 130: Line 130:
             * marking with diacritics (Icelandic with acute accent)             * marking with diacritics (Icelandic with acute accent)
             * doubling of vowel letter (Dutch)             * doubling of vowel letter (Dutch)
 +
 +==== 2017-07-27 ====
 +  * idea of a regular appointment in the IRC channel to discuss stuff
 +    * proposal: every wednesday 19:00UTC
 +
 +==== 2017-10-29 ====
 +  * discussion about strong verbs
 +    * strong verbs seem to be use throughout the Germanic languages even if not very consistently
 +    * having them for the past tenses makes the language somewhat more complex, thus using the regular form instead should probably be allowed
 +    * strong verbs seem to form the base of certain nominalizations and adjectivizations; resorting to not using those (similar) forms could result in comprehension problems and alienation (EN "to sing; sang; sung" -> "song"; DE "singen; sang; gesungen" -> "Gesang","Sänger"; DE "trinken" -> "Getränk","Trank","Trunk"...)
 +  * discussion about the comparative and superlative (of adjectives)
 +    * PG features -ōzô and -izô for the comparative but a distinction was lost in quite some languages and from present point of view making a distinction in the Nordic language is not really possible if you don't know it already
 +    * proposal of merging the families of -ōzô and -izô
 +    * proposal of using the suffix -er for the comparative
 +    * proposal of using the suffix -est for the superlative
 +    * proposal of using the descendants of PG maizô (EN more) and PG maist (EN most) in certain to-be-defined cases in which the suffixes wouldn't do)
protocols.txt · Last modified: 2017/10/31 22:49 by rayza