User Tools

Site Tools


sample_texts

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sample_texts [2014/02/13 03:11]
fenris created
sample_texts [2014/07/13 13:05]
fenris
Line 1: Line 1:
 +===== Overview ======
 +
 Here are some examples of what Folksprak might look like when it's done: Here are some examples of what Folksprak might look like when it's done:
   * [[De Tormbu at Babel]]   * [[De Tormbu at Babel]]
Line 9: Line 11:
     * //„Man find fir rume ine de smal hus.“//     * //„Man find fir rume ine de smal hus.“//
     * //„Kom to min rum on ik vil tele to du, vat vi vil done morgen!“//     * //„Kom to min rum on ik vil tele to du, vat vi vil done morgen!“//
-    * //„Folksprak ar en sprak, vilk man kan furstoe if man ar en spreker av en Germanisk sprak; ok if man hav nit lernt it.“//+    * //„Folksprak ar en sprak, vilk man kan furstane if man ar en sprekar av en Germanisk sprak; ok if man hav nit lernt it.“//
     * //„Vi hav nit nok tid fur done dis.“//     * //„Vi hav nit nok tid fur done dis.“//
     * //„Prov, at de is ar fast, for du go up it!.“//     * //„Prov, at de is ar fast, for du go up it!.“//
  
 +===== Discussion =====
 +I've changed "ef" into "if", because it's equally well supported and moreover because it's very internationally recognisable thanks to computer programming languages. ~~~ Ob
 +
 +> Hmm, IMO one should not take such things into account, since then English would always "win". The reason why i took **ef** was, that "e" is a more neutral sound than "i" and that in speach **if** has a higher chance of getting confused with something else (e.g. "eve"). But vocabulary has to be discussed later ~~~ Fenris
sample_texts.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/11 20:11 by fenris