User Tools

Site Tools



This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
word_order [2014/02/13 17:11]
fenris created
word_order [2019/09/26 14:41]
ob V2 section, for discussion
Line 6: Line 6:
   * scheme: ''<subject> <predicate> <object-direct> <object-indirect>.''   * scheme: ''<subject> <predicate> <object-direct> <object-indirect>.''
   * example: **De volf giv en sten to de fogel.**   * example: **De volf giv en sten to de fogel.**
-== Proposal 2 == 
-  * scheme: ''<subject> <predicate> <object-direct> <object-indirect>.'' 
   * references: [[References#cha07|cha07]]   * references: [[References#cha07|cha07]]
Line 75: Line 72:
   * example: **Giv en sten to de fogel!**   * example: **Giv en sten to de fogel!**
 +==== The V2 question ====
 +Should FS include V2? The system described by David Parke in his Frenkisch grammar might be suitable. The advantages are familiarity and normality for all Germanic speakers except the Anglophones, but the disadvantages are extra complexity that makes FS harder and weirder for outsiders, and also the presence of ambiguity in certain places.
word_order.txt ยท Last modified: 2021/01/08 12:25 by ob