This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
word_order [2014/08/17 16:54] fenris [Declarative sentence] |
word_order [2021/01/08 12:25] ob implicit dative notion |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* example: **De volf giv en sten to de fogel.** | * example: **De volf giv en sten to de fogel.** | ||
* references: [[References# | * references: [[References# | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Implicit dative == | ||
+ | |||
+ | In Idiom Neutral, dative objects are allowed to appear without the preposition //to// if they immediately precede direct objects. This is mostly expected when the dative is a pronoun. In terms of FS, this would yield: **De volf giv de fogel en sten.** Whether FS should copy this rule is an open question. | ||
=== With an adverbial correlative === | === With an adverbial correlative === | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
* example: **Giv en sten to de fogel!** | * example: **Giv en sten to de fogel!** | ||
+ | ==== The V2 question ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Should FS include V2? The system described by David Parke in his Frenkisch grammar might be suitable. The advantages are familiarity and normality for all Germanic speakers except the Anglophones, |